| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | none |
BS> I fail to understand how *anyone* from outside the 1-* BS> dial system could actually get connected to an emergency system. BS> In the "India" example, I'd have to dial "011" plus the country BS> code, plus the routing code, plus the local number. No where BS> would this ever translate into a pure "911". I'd say the same BS> should apply to Australia, or wherever else. So all that would BS> be needed is to simply do not have whatever their *local* dial BS> codes mimic their emergency number(s) entered into their BS> nodelist. Ditto for anywhere else. thank you for stating it so succienctly... the only way that i know of is for the mailer with the problem to be improperly configured... MvdV (apologies if i got the abbreviation incorrect) posted at least one method that it could happen... that method being an incomplete dial translation table... in his example, it resulted in national calls (in his area?) being handled properly(?) but all international (to him) calls resulting in the raw nodelisted number being dialed without translation and/or any special dialing codes being prepended... in any case, it comes right back to what i and others have been saying all along... specifically, the keywords are "improperly configured" ;) )\/(ark* Origin: (1:3634/12) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 3634/12 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.