> Good morning, Jack
 >      Okay, so it's maybe not morning.  *sigh*
 >  -=> Quoting Jack Sargeant to All <=-
 >  JS> This morning I saw a news item on CNN that the government is relaxing
 >  JS> much of their top-secret atomic bomb testing information along with
 >      Hmmm, more evidence of hitherto unknown tests on an
 > unsuspecting populace?
 >      But the real catch is:
 >  JS> making public all past top-secret information that is not considered
 >  JS> a matter of national security." Although no mention of UFOs were
 >      Define "national security".  Or, better yet, have the
 > government do so.  Then have them define what all that includes.
 > There are documents left over from World War I that are still
 > classified.  I wonder if "national security" will be invoked when
 > asked about declassifying them as well.
Good point. ...And I wouldn't want to make any bets against it.
 >      In a situation of mutual distrust between the government and
 > the governed, *any* such announcement must be taken with a grain
 > of salt as to its completeness and veracity.  Um, a "grain" the
 > size of Kansas ought to be about right.
Agreed!
 >      Oh, by the way ... I'm back again - hopefully to stay this time.
 > Michael
You are a real "blast from the past."  Welcome back.
Regards,
Jack
--- FMail 1.22
---------------