>> JE> well worth it to, for their attitude. A slander suit comes to
>> Too much of a problem to even bother.
JE> Not only for yourself, but check with some other HAM's up there, and
JE> possibly a class-action suit against Rogers Cable could be benifitial to
JE> everyone involved!
None are interested in pursuing it,nor in trying to help me resolve it.
I am going to let it sit as it is and use the large beams for TV.
>> Now if I TVI they can blow it out their ears.
JE> But, what does it prove?
When the IOC comes a knocking I'm ready for it.
They can test my gear,it'll pass inspection and I have all the needed
filters inline all the time. I no longer TVI'ing our own TV upstairs,and it
is getting its signal off-air from the TV beams now instead of cable.
I'll take them on a little `tour' of several of the local CATV junction
boxes in my area and show them how much signal is radiating out from
distances of as little as 50 feet and as far away as 2 blocks away from the
boxes.
I'll take them over to the house across the street who has such crappy CATV
he gets 2 channels on the same spot on the dial on his new 1997 home theatre
TV.
Their system is garbage and they deny it,blaming me and my `modified' gear
for the problem when it is their own garbage installation that is at fault.
When an inspector shows up and sees the signal levels splattering out across
a wide variety of both the amateur and commercial frequencies around here
then something will happen. (preferably CATV getting told where to go!)
>> The station is `squeeky clean' from an RF standpoint
JE> If the "powers that be" don't know about the installers and their
JE> attitudes, who's going to know? (Besides us, and what can -we- do about
Talked to a `big cheese' in the head office.
He said they would `investigate ' and find out exactly why their
installation inspector behaved as he did and let me know.
2 weeks later and all I get is a voice-mail instead of a human at his
umber,
and still no response from them about their findings.
Guess he's busy taking care of it...
JE> Went to a swapfest in Belton, TX (near Temple, between Austin and Waco)
and
JE> picked up not only another Johnson Viking II, but also got a Kenwood
JE> TR-9000, multi-mode VHF 10w transciever. Now, to get busy and build me
JE> pair of 13-element yagis, and shove 'em up at 40'!
I used to have one of those! It was my first 2m all-mode rig for the house.
A `blistering' 11w on ssb/cw and 1w to 8w on FM.
Looked like the big HF rigs of the time (late 1980) and had some of the same
features too. (RIT,dual VFO's for odd-splits,memories)
I sold mine to get something newer (TM-255A) as the 9000 did not have a
CTCSS encode/decode option for it. (several rptrs went to CTCSS on inputs)
Nice little rig for a field-day or rover set-up,just add an outboard
amplifier
to get you up to 100w or so into a beam and you're all set.
--- GoldED 2.42.G1219
---------------
* Origin: VE3SJN....Moderator....HAM_TECH (1:163/506.4)
|