>> WD> ZC3 considers it a problem and that is enough for me.

>> no doubt... anything that appears to further your agenda is quite ok and
>> backed by you... this is actually not a surprise, to be honest with you
>> about it...

 WD> For me it became an issue when a former ZC3 objected to having
 WD> 000 in the nodelist, prior to that they were there.

yeah, ok...

 WD> As long as the current and any future ZC3 continue to think it
 WD> is an issue the situation will remain like that.

keyword is "think"... with a properly configured FTN mailer,
keyword "properly", this is not an issue and there are more and
more examples all the time that show that it is not an issue...

 WD> Funny that you cast a shadow on my willingness to co-operate
 WD> with another ZC, while you are quiet about ZC3 ZC4 and ZC5 who
 WD> also carry no 000-entries.

you are more vocal than they are so you are the foremost target in the
situation... can't take the heat? get out of the kitchen!

 WD> Talk about an agenda ... :)

i don't have an agenda... never have, actually... i call it as i see it... period...

)\/(ark