AWL> Most Sysops are incompetant morons, NFSE.

RS> They might feel the same way about you Alex, or worse |-)

AWL> Bet I can take 80% of them on an FTSC-001 exam... :-)

Pity thats completely and utterly irrelevant Alex. All they basically
care about is whether their mailer is compliant with it, and the node
number allocation procedure has been specifically structured to test
that compliance. That doesnt make them incompetent morons, it actually
just shows that they efficiently ensure their mailer is FTSC-001 compliant.

AWL> Many of them don't know what a hold is, let alone a TOPT kludge line.

RS> Conveniently faking from 'most' to 'many' and hoping no one notices.

AWL> Most are morons.

Nope.

AWL> Some of the morons do know what a hold is.

You havent established that most are morons. Just proclaimed that.

AWL> If only to annoy people they don't like by putting large files on hold
AWL> (Bill, have you considered doing this to discourage ZMH callers?)...

You might well find that would qualify as excessively annoying behaviour Alex.

AWL> Hell, some of them don't know what a PATH line means...

RS> And now onto 'some'

AWL> Most are morons, many don't know what a hold is, some
AWL> can't even read a path line. Subset of a subset Rod...

Pity you never actually established the first one Alex, and the others
are all quite irrelevant to doing that, and you havent even established
that those who dont understand the PATH are actually a subset of those
who dont understand the HOLD either. Faking Alex.

AWL> (I wish I'd saved that message, the guy
AWL> was obvious PhD in Nosepicking material :-)...

RS> And now onto just one.

AWL> Particular instance of a Moron who doesn't know what a hold is, etc...

Nope, just pathetic faking and mindless fido bashing the whole message.

--- PQWK202