23 Mar 06 10:27, Vladimir Donskoy wrote to Roy Witt:

 VD>>> OK. You wish to have what format of IP-address record?
 RW>> Since it's none of Ward's business, ask your Z6C...

 VD> As it Ward has become angry, the question has been set to it.

Let him fume.

 VD>  Z6C (Carol) has approved this format of my (and not only my) string,
 VD> and old Z6-Nodelist-maker (Tung) too...

If they have a problem with it, they should contact her, not you.

 RW>> If she can't clear it up for you, no one can.
 RW>> She may have a preference for that method, but there are better ways
 RW>> that wouldn't give you such a headache with Ward or Malcom. Use the
 RW>> INA flag with a dns lookup name and leave the phone field blank or
 RW>> use something like the flag INA - INA:dvb.marvelm.ru - along with
 RW>> your IBN flag.

 VD> OK, I'm agree with you. However now there is a reorganization in a
 VD> zone6, therefore changes in nodelist should wait.

Actually, if you make the change now, it won't affect any reorganizational
attempts in Z6. You'd just be updating your listing.

 RW>> BTW, your Z2 listed IP lookup at dvb.marvelm.ru doesn't work,
 RW>> although the Z6 IP of 213.134.221.195 does.

 VD> Work, this is two Internet channels to my node machine, so you can
 VD> call my with both addresses (but vbd.marvelm.ru == 213.134.221.195
 VD> preferred because it is more speedy channel).

My binkp mailer doesn't have a problem connecting with yours, using the
the 213.xx numbers, but the DNS server doesn't seem to resolve from here.
Dunno why.

Roy
--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000