| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Are Ares I and V red herrings or the way to the Moon? |
NASAs current plan for returning to the Moon is Project Constellation which consists of designing two rockets the Ares_I and Ares_V, a manned capsule Orion, an Earth Departure Stage (EDS) [rocket], Lunar Surface Access Module (LSAM) and plans for a Moon Base. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Constellation> The plan calls for the Ares_I launch vehicle to lift the astronauts in the Orion capsule into Earth orbit and for the larger Ares_V to lift everything else. Two different design of rockets for the same mission appears expensive. Since design costs are much larger than the small scale manufacturing costs I wonder if just the Ares_V needs designing? Even if two different rockets are needed could the Ares_I be replaced by SpaceX's Falcon 9 Heavy rocket? http://www.spacex.com> Alternately could NASA come up with its own rocket to launch the lot? Andrew Swallow --- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32* Origin: Time Warp of the Future BBS - Home of League 10 (1:14/400) SEEN-BY: 633/267 5030/786 @PATH: 14/400 261/38 123/500 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.