| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | So now some of us are stupid |
Hello All! For years folks have used the zones greater than 6 to operate Non-Fidonet networks. For years many of us have shared zone numbers with little or no problems. Apparently there is a move in Zone 2 by some Fidonet syspps in Russia to start a new Fidonet Zone 7. When I've posed questions about how they plan to coordinate this use with existing Zone 7 users, I haven't received any comments that would lead me to believe they will consider the kind of cooperative use that exists now. The FidoNews Editor had this to say: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Area : IC Echo Date : Thu Sep 16, 17:22 From : Bj”rn Felten 2:203/2 To : Vladimir Donskoy Subj : ZC/2-status ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ VD> Please answer, which FIDONET's nodelist has "Othernets" as Zone 7? Other VD> networks are not interesting - it is not FIDONET! Absolutely true, Vladimir! I can't believe some people are actually using that as an argument against forming a zone 7. If someone decided to use FTN for their own project, that's fine. But if they were stupid enough to use zone number 7, when they have at least 255 to choose from, any problems *they* run into serves themselves -- to fidonet it's absolutely no problems. --- GEcho 1.20/Pro* Origin: news://felten.dyndns.org (2:203/2) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 261/1352 38 123/500 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.