*** Quoting Roy Witt from a message to Carol Shenkenberger ***

 CS> an INA flag or in the location field (INA i guess would be more
 CS> standard now?). It is an odd entry but i only tweaked the existing
 CS> one to remove some redundant modem codes, leaving the rest alone as i
 CS> didnt have a FQDN for him til now.  Just his static IP.  Perhaps the
 CS> 'format problem' is that?

RW> Well, I had to enter that manually in Irex here, since it wasn't in th
RW> proper place in the nodelist.

Yes, now would INA suit you best or would one of the others suit best?  

 CS> on his Z2 address.  Moscow I think?

RW> Since when does it matter where an ION node is located? Their only
RW> physical location is the internet anyway. For all anyone knows, he cou
RW> be physically located in Vladivostock...

True, but it's 'nice to know'.


RW> It seems to me that it's a shame that you allow Ward to get his way in
RW> killing Z6, when it would be much better for Fidonet as a whole to mov
RW> the russkies to Z6...that way, Ward can't make the false claim that he
RW> the ZC of the largest zone in Fidonet, without the Russian's consent.

Ah but cant force them to move and they voted it down themselves.
                                       xxcarol

--- Telegard v3.09.g2-sp4