>> Is anyone using NASM 0.95? How does it compare to other Assemblers
 >> that you have tried.
JV> I'm (trying) to use NASM 0.94 under Linux now and then. What I'm
 > lacking is a good debugger, actually lacking a method to generate
 > a symbol table that the debuggers will accept..
 > DOS's NASM is good, and you can get it to work somewhat well with
 > ZD86-101, sans symbols (the best part of a debugger). ZD86 works
 > fairly well (most of the time) with Arrow assembler.
...I have been hearing a lot about this "NASM" for Dos, where can I get a
copy...
... J. Nixon * Kenosha * Wisconsin * U.S.A *
___ TagDude 0.84 [Unregistered]
---
---------------