*** Quoting Michiel van der Vlist from a message to Carol Shenkenberger ***

 CS> True, but it's 'nice to know'.

MvdV> The only argument for splitting up Z2 that ever made sense to me is th
MvdV> it is "too wide for one ZMH".

So is Z6 really.  Z1 also has that problem when you add Hawaii.

 RW>> It seems to me that it's a shame that you allow Ward to get his
 RW>> way in killing Z6, when it would be much better for Fidonet as a
 RW>> whole to mov the russkies to Z6...that way, Ward can't make the
 RW>> false claim that he the ZC of the largest zone in Fidonet, without
 RW>> the Russian's consent.

MvdV> How does splitting Z2 in such a way that the new zone 6 spans from Mos
MvdV> to the date boundery make any sense regarding the "too wide for one ZM


Please note you are requoting the post of another.  Might add, you omitted
my own reply to it.
                                       xxcarol

--- Telegard v3.09.g2-sp4