Re: Re: TgNet
  By: Kevin Nunn to Bryan Hamilton on Mon Aug 15 2005 11:42 am

 > -=> BRYAN HAMILTON wrote to KEVIN NUNN <=-
 > 
 >  BH> like i said id like to telnet to a board that has tgnet so i can check
 >  BH> things out. but if zenet took it over or whatever.. dunno. all i know
 >  BH> is i gotz to be the last telegard sysop ever. i refuse to use renegade
 >  BH> ever since Cott Lang left the project. and i'm not fond of other bbs
 >  BH> packages like i was renegade/telegard
 > 
 > Well, Zenet has zero TG message bases, I think the idea was that TGnet
 > was very slow as far as messages go, so they were wanting to just take
 > TGnet nodes, merge them into Zenet and then desolve TGnet. Atleast that
 > is where I figured it was headed.
 > 
 > A TG network would be rather slow since there are only a few of us left,
 > we might be best served just using this telegard echo :) If TG ever
 > takes off again, which I really don't think it will, then maybe it could
 > be started again, but I have a feeling it will be empty 90% of the time
 > unless we have general discussion echos.
 > 
 > Kev
 > 
 > 
 > ... 2 + 2 = 5 for extremely large values of 2.

that could very well be.. who knows. i'm interested in getting my tg system
more stable. i run tg 3.09g2sp4 and i tell ya.. the nodes crash all the time.
local, dialups, and my telnet nodes. i bet on  a daily basis. i have to copy
over the nodes.dat file from a backup 1 to 3 times a day


--- SBBSecho 2.10-Win32