"Jeff Binkley -> Dan Ceppa"  wrote in news:9712
$HOLYSMOKE{at}JamNNTPd:

 DC>>> Your proposed "alternate theory" has nothing at
all to do with
 DC>>> science.

 JB>>> I've not made that claim yet you keep tossing up the argument.
 JB>>> It sure  makes you look foolish.

 DC>> The fool is you, Jeff.  You keep on trying to have it taught as an
 DC>> alternate theory to the scientific Theory of Evolution.

 DC>> And there you go, unable to back up ID as science.

 JB> I have explained to you numerous times that I am not making this debate.
 JB> You are.  So you are free to continue this discussion with yourself.


 DC>> Until you can
 DC>> provide the scientic basis of ID, everything else you claim for
 DC>> its inclusion falls squarely on its collected asses.

 JB> Let's see, what exactly have I claimed ?  I've made the statement that
 JB> ID bring into question a number of things which the theory of evolution
 JB> is unable to answer.  I've made no other claims.  I am sure you are
 JB> imagining some in your mind but please try to differentiate them from
 JB> what I've actually stated.

Because ID falls back on the handy-dandy, "Since we don't know yet,
(emphasis on YET,) we'll just throw out a supernatural story."

"And to hell with the scientific method."

--- Xnews/5.04.25