| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: none |
-=> On 04-17-06 07:54, Ward Dossche <=-
-=> spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: none <=-
> What was the vote? I thought someone posted it and the majority of
> those voting prefered a switch?
WD> That is the eternally unanswerable question of "What is a
majority?".
Usually a well defined term. What is often fuzzy is when you put "of
what" at the end of that sentence. I said "majority of those
voting". Your response implies that it is accurate to say that the
majority of those voting prefered a switch, albeit by a slim margin.
WD> In the specific case the army of voters was somewhere
WD> around 4-5,000 people at the time the referendum was
WD> launched. Of these 615, replied to the poll. Of these some
WD> 55%, i.e. 300-310 answered, in an affirmative manner "one
WD> way or the other", but not in a conclusive way.
Hmm, 55% of 615 sounds like the vote was about 337 to 278 in favor
of moving.
[added later: In another message you stated that 561 responded.
55% of 561 would be 308, in line with the rest of what you said.
Did your fingers get twisted? ]
WD> So how can 310 people out of a group of 5,000 constitute a majority?
I've seen 33 out of 10,000 be called a unanimous vote (i.e. in take
over of FN_SYSOP).
WD> In which manner were the 4,000+ sysops contacted? Were they
WD> all contacted? Did the poll reach them all? Did the
WD> majority vote with their feet?
Those are important questions -- the answers to which be relevant in
any such situation. What are the answers in this situation? I'd
think that is something the IC would like to hear.
WD> My view on this? The poll seems to have been conducted in a
WD> less than thorough manner.
Could be -- I have no way of knowing, and it is not something that I
have any great concern with. I only said something because what
xxCarol was saying did not quite fit with what I had seen posted here.
If the two of you require a majority of *all* sysops to express a
desire to move, then you know that will never happen. It would be
harder than getting a majority of all RCs to say anything, and you and
I have had experience with how hard that was to make happen (in
another context -- at another time).
With all of that said, I shall retreat back into the shadows and leave
the discussion to the two of you and the IC.
Dale Shipp
fido_261_1466 (at) comcast (dot) net
(1:261/1466)
... Shipwrecked on Hesperus in Columbia, Maryland. 22:41:09, 17 Apr 2006
___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30
--- Maximus/NT 3.01
* Origin: Owl's Anchor (1:261/1466)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 261/1466 123/500 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.