From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From Address: YourName{at}YourISP.com (Your Name)
Subject: Re: Star Trek Into Darkness

In article ,
nyc2001{at}nuttyyahoo.isr wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:17:08 +1200, YourName{at}YourISP.com (Your Name)
> wrote:
> >In article ,
> >nyc2001{at}nuttyyahoo.isr wrote:
> >> On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 13:52:59 -0700 (PDT), Will Dockery
> >>  wrote:
> >> >On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 2:07:06 PM UTC-4,
wheresou...{at}israels.wars wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> You misspelled, "retarded".
> >> >
> >> >I just saw the film a second time, and actually can't complain.
> >> >
> >> >Looks like a set up for a bit of Managerie and Search For Spock 
> >> >(now Search For Pike?).
> >> >
> >> >Spock's mind meld with the dying Admiral pike.
> >> >
> >> >Khan blood being so good for reviving dead characters.
> >> >
> >> >And maybe... Carol Marcus is already pregnant by the end
of the film?
> >> >
> >> >Some trouble with Tribbles next up?
> >> >
> >> >The debut of Christine Chappel?
> >> 
> >> Whatever, dude.
> >> 
> >> I thought it sucked hickory smoked horse buttholes from a cup.
> >> 
> >> See my review (05-26-13).
> >
> >Wow! You're being mighty generaous ... 
> 
> I'm just that kind of guy.
> 
> >Abrams' so-called "Star Trek" doesn't reach even those
'heights' of quality.
> 
> Hope you didn't pay to see it.

Nope. I'll never pay to see Abrams' so-called "Star Trek" crap and I won't
even bother watching it when it eventually plays on one of the free TV
channels. I'm dreading the mess the useless moron will probably make of
the "Star Wars" franchise too.  :-(
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux