mark lewis -> David Drummond wrote:
 BF>>>    Don't you think it is a much graver violation of *our* freedom,
 ml> that
 BF>>> 6614 zone 2 nodes plus the 690 zone 1 nodes that indirectly get
 ml> affected
 BF>>> -- all according to the latest stats -- will have to be
 ml> sacrificed, on
 BF>>> the altar of political correctness, because of the assumed
 ml> stupidity of
 BF>>> some 20 Aussie sysops? Doesn't *our* individual freedom count at all?

 DD>> Why inconvenience even 20 Aussies sysops when the IP can be
 DD>> listed elsewhere that doesn't break anything?

 ml> it does break something... it breaks my mailer that reads and operates
 ml> on POTS or IP numbers or domain names in that field... my mailer doesn't
 ml> pull connect info from the location field or the system name field
 ml> because those fields do not contain connection info... ;)

so... the whole world must bend just to accommodate your kludged mailer?

yep - that sounds fair.....

-- 

regards

David

---