DC> DC>Like hell you do.  You know you can't produce the evidence.
DC> DC>That's why  you made than lame attempt to pawn you role off on
DC> DC>me.  It's not working. Your "logic" isn't.

DC> JB> I never claimed I was going to provide you evidence.  I simply
DC> JB> do not  believe you.  I am not sure why you are having such a
DC> JB> difficult time  understanding this.  
DC> 
DC>It doesn't matter if you believe me or not, Jeff.  

It does to me.  It may not to you.  That is your issue to deal with.


DC>The fact is that I've got your promissory note and you can't prove 
DC>that I don't. 

I don't care whether you do or not.  You are welcome to keep it, frame 
it and hang it on the wall.  I don't care.  


DC> DC>Then, Jeff, as you did not prove I don't have the document, pay
DC>up.  

DC> JB> I am not paying you a dime. 

DC>That only means that you are being obstinate.  It still doesn't prove
DC>I don't have that note. 

It means I don't believe you.  We've been over this how many times now, 
5 or 6 ? 

 
DC> DC>LOL!  Of course it's a waste of your time.  You didn't accomplish
DC> DC>it  then.  You haven't accomplished it now.  

DC> JB> I know the level of intellect I am dealing with and thus will
DC> JB> not waste  my time on things which are beyond your
DC> JB> comprehension. 

DC>It's your comprehension that is a fault.  Try as much as you like,
DC>but you  cannot prove I don't have the document.  All you have done
DC>so far is  to refuse to pay.  

I am not trying to prove that you have the document or not.  As soon as 
you actually start reading what I wrote and stop injecting your own 
belief of what I wrote, the sooner we have a chance at a rational 
discussion,  Until then you just continue to project your own ideas and 
we'll see how far that doesn't get you.


DC> JB> I don't care whether you have the document or not.  I still have
DC> JB> my  money and that is what matters. 
DC> 
DC> 
DC> DC>Now, be the coward you are and run away again.  

DC> JB> You sound like Sauer on the playground.

DC>Jeff, you are the one who has clained to not be able to prove a
DC>negative  but have done so.  You still haven't peovwn that I don't

You lie again.  I made no such claim in this entire discussion thread.  
I demand you show where I made such a claim.  You can't.  


DC>have that  promissory note of yours.  Waving your hands around and
DC>screaming  "Is Not!" is not a proof.  

No hand waiving here.  I am ambivalent to whether you have a note or 
not.  If you have one fine.  If you don't that is fine too.  

In case you haven't figured this out yet, yours is a stupid argument but 
there is a valuable lesson inside regarding mathematical testable 
limits.  It tears at the heart of your extremist arguments but I don't 
expect you or your pup to recognize it.  Neither of you have shown any  
understanding of basic mathematics and logic.



Jeff   

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999 
Democrats --  The party responsible for the housing meltdown ....


--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10