RS> JB>>> It is irrelevant to the topic at hand and not something I
RS>chose
RS> DC>> to

RS> DC>> Wrong again, Jeff.

RS> JB> It is irrelevant to the topic at hand.  As I have stated
RS>numerous times,
RS> JB> our government run schools teach many things which, including
RS>truckloads
RS> JB> of leftwing dogma, are not science.  Again, I continue to see
RS> JB> fear in your responses.  I don't see tolerance, understanding or
RS> JB> a big tent.

RS>Science works by a series of rules.
RS>On "60 Minutes" recently, they had a segment on "cold
fusion," and we
RS>heard a lot of wild theories, that can't be backed up by actual
RS>evidence.

RS>Likewise, "intelligent design" is not science.
RS>Because for intelligent design to be valid, a key rule of the
RS>scientific method has to be simply ignored, namely the one about
RS>evidence. We're not talking about attacking evolution, which is all
RS>you keep doing.
RS>Your theory, states that some super-being, (just admit it, he's your
RS>God,) waved his hand or whatever and *PIF* life evolved.
RS>Yet there is no evidence whatsoever for this.

It is irrelevant to the topic at hand.  I don't know how many times I 
have to repeat this to you and Dan.  I am not making the argument that 
ID is science so I have no idea why you keep wanting to debate something 
I am not saying.  You are arguing with yourself.  

The two of you keep projecting your own beliefs into the discussion and 
in turn believe I am saying things I am not.  The bigotry that the two 
of you are demonstrating is beyond weird and close to pathological.


Jeff 

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999 
Patriotism is not who can leak the most Secret documents to the NY Times ...


--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10