| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: TgNet |
-=> BRYAN HAMILTON wrote to KEVIN NUNN <=- BH> like i said id like to telnet to a board that has tgnet so i can check BH> things out. but if zenet took it over or whatever.. dunno. all i know BH> is i gotz to be the last telegard sysop ever. i refuse to use renegade BH> ever since Cott Lang left the project. and i'm not fond of other bbs BH> packages like i was renegade/telegard Well, Zenet has zero TG message bases, I think the idea was that TGnet was very slow as far as messages go, so they were wanting to just take TGnet nodes, merge them into Zenet and then desolve TGnet. Atleast that is where I figured it was headed. A TG network would be rather slow since there are only a few of us left, we might be best served just using this telegard echo :) If TG ever takes off again, which I really don't think it will, then maybe it could be started again, but I have a feeling it will be empty 90% of the time unless we have general discussion echos. Kev ... 2 + 2 = 5 for extremely large values of 2. --- Telegard/2/QWK v3.09.g2-sp4/mL* Origin: Razor's Domain BBS (1:397/10) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 397/10 1 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.