RS> JB>>>>> It is irrelevant to the topic at hand and not
something I
RS> RS>> chose
RS> DC>>>> to

RS> DC>>>> Wrong again, Jeff.

RS> JB>>> It is irrelevant to the topic at hand.  As I have stated
RS> RS>> numerous times,
RS> JB>>> our government run schools teach many things which, including
RS> RS>> truckloads
RS> JB>>> of leftwing dogma, are not science.  Again, I continue to see
RS> JB>>> fear in your responses.  I don't see tolerance, understanding
RS> JB> or RS> JB> a big tent.

RS> RS>> Science works by a series of rules.
RS> RS>> On "60 Minutes" recently, they had a segment on
"cold fusion,"
RS>and  JB> we RS>heard a lot of wild theories, that can't be backed up
RS>by actual  RS>> evidence.

RS> RS>> Likewise, "intelligent design" is not science.
RS> RS>> Because for intelligent design to be valid, a key rule of the
RS> RS>> scientific method has to be simply ignored, namely the one
RS> RS>> about evidence. We're not talking about attacking evolution,
RS> RS>> which is all you keep doing.
RS> RS>> Your theory, states that some super-being, (just admit it, he's
RS> JB> your RS>God,) waved his hand or whatever and *PIF* life evolved.
RS> RS>> Yet there is no evidence whatsoever for this.

RS> JB> It is irrelevant to the topic at hand.  I don't know how many
RS> JB> times I have to repeat this to you and Dan.  I am not making the
RS> JB> argument that ID is science so I have no idea why you keep
RS> JB> wanting to debate something I am not saying.  You are arguing
RS> JB> with yourself.

RS>Then yes or no.
RS>No more lame excuses.
RS>Should ID be taught in public schools, in a science classroom?

It should be taught in public schools.  I'll withhold comment on whether 
it should be in a science classroom or not.


RS>The Dover, PA fundys on the school board there tried pushing this.
RS>The ID proponents showed themselves to be liars and religious bigots,
RS>and total boobs when it came to science.

RS>The judge ruled against the board, who had their sorry asses kicked
RS>off the school board by voters.

RS>"Good Christians" sent many death threats against the judge.

RS>*YOU* stated the judge was wrong and you disagreed with his decision.
RS>You refuse to say why.

That is a lie.  I already answered this.  


RS> JB> The two of you keep projecting your own beliefs into the
RS> JB> discussion and in turn believe I am saying things I am not.  The
RS> JB> bigotry that the two of you are demonstrating is beyond weird
RS> JB> and close to pathological.

RS>Yes I do have bigotry towards hysterical, unevidenced authoritarian
RS>beliefs. So sue me.

Many of us have known this for some time.  You have nothing worth suing 
for.



Jeff

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999 
Progressive taxation is economic slavery for those who succeed .....


--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10