| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Star Trek Into Darkness |
From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From Address: will.dockery{at}gmail.com
Subject: Re: Star Trek Into Darkness
Dani...{at}teranews.com wrote:
>
> The Abrams' films are not "so-called "Star Trek"
movies", they are "Star
>
> Trek" movies. Maybe they don't fit into your blinkered view of what is
>
> "Star Trek" and what isn't "Star Trek", but they
are "Star Trek", at
>
> least as far as the people who own the rights to that term are concerned.
>
> Makes you, and others with similar opinions, seem very childish!
>
> IMHO, of course.
Not only are the two J.J. Abrams films "Star Trek", I find them
to be pretty darn good Star Trek, personally.
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux
* Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)SEEN-BY: 3/0 633/267 712/0 101 620 848 @PATH: 2320/105 0/0 261/38 712/848 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.