ML>
ML> NP> Perhaps, but according to what I've read on the NRA's home page
ML> NP> the  2nd amendments been up before the Supreme Court several
ML> NP> times in the  past, and pretty much uniformly been held as an
ML> NP> individual right.
ML>   I believe the question of the second amendment being an individual
ML>right  has never been to the Supreme Court. The cases that have been
ML>there have  all been on narrow technical grounds or perphial issues.
ML>"Miller" for  example was quite limited in scope.
I had always thoughtso myself, but apparently not so.  The NRA's home
page on the web had some cases.  But that's all I can tell you.  I'm not
"connected" anymore at the moment.  But if you've a web acount, it might
be worth surfing over there and reading it.  It was rather interesting.
I don't think any of the cases were singularly about the 2nd amendment,
but involved it peripherally or partially.  Interesting rulings by the
supreme court.  I don't understand why it isn't mentioned today that
there have been court rulings supporting the 2nd amendment.
---
* CMPQwk #1.4* UNREGISTERED EVALUATION COPY
--- InterEcho 1.18
---------------