| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | A FUNDY PAIL FULL OF SHIT |
-> On 28 Apr 09 15:47:00, Jeff Binkley got back to Dan Ceppa -> Re: A FUNDY PAIL FULL OF SHIT DC> DC>Like hell you do. You know you can't produce the evidence. DC> DC>That's why you made than lame attempt to pawn you role off on DC> DC>me. It's not working. Your "logic" isn't. DC> JB> I never claimed I was going to provide you evidence. I simply DC> JB> do not believe you. I am not sure why you are having such a DC> JB> difficult time understanding this. DC> DC>It doesn't matter if you believe me or not, Jeff. JB> It does to me. It may not to you. That is your issue to deal with. Wrong. Jeff. Once again you try to dkvert your need to provide evidence for the negative. One of these days, you'll understand why. DC>The fact is that I've got your promissory note and you can't prove DC>that I don't. JB> I don't care whether you do or not. You are welcome to keep it, frame JB> it and hang it on the wall. I don't care. That's right, Jeff, pretend that: A: You never stated that you could prove a negative. B: Proved that negative and claim victory. DC>That only means that you are being obstinate. It still doesn't prove DC>I don't have that note. JB> It means I don't believe you. We've been over this how many times JB> now, 5 or 6 ? Yep, and you still haven't gotten it. DC>It's your comprehension that is a fault. Try as much as you like, DC>but you cannot prove I don't have the document. All you have done DC>so far is to refuse to pay. JB> I am not trying to prove that you have the document or not. As soon Yes, you are. DC>Jeff, you are the one who has clained to not be able to prove a DC>negative but have done so. You still haven't peovwn that I don't JB> You lie again. I made no such claim in this entire discussion thread. JB> I demand you show where I made such a claim. You can't. You asked me to provide the proof, Jeff. You know, that proof you get. JB> limits. It tears at the heart of your extremist arguments but I don't JB> expect you or your pup to recognize it. Neither of you have shown any JB> understanding of basic mathematics and logic. What extremist argument? Proving a negative is easy for you. You stated just in the past. Have you forgotten how to do it already? ... "Hey, don't look at that man behind that curtain!" -- OZ --- OMX/Blue Wave/DOS v2.30* Origin: Soundly on the Fault Line (1:138/666.0) SEEN-BY: 10/1 3 11/331 14/250 34/999 120/228 123/500 128/2 140/1 222/2 226/0 SEEN-BY: 249/303 250/306 261/20 38 100 1381 1404 1406 1418 266/1413 280/1027 SEEN-BY: 320/119 396/45 633/260 267 690/734 712/848 800/432 801/161 189 SEEN-BY: 2222/700 2320/100 105 2905/0 @PATH: 138/666 146 140/1 261/38 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.