DC> DC> DC> DC>LOL!  I see that you haven't bothered to provide the
DC> DC> DC> DC>scientific theory  of ID/creationism.  

DC> DC> DC> JB> It is irrelevant to the discussion.  

DC> DC> DC>The only way you could be more wrong about that is to
DC> DC> DC>continue to believe  the horse shit called "Intelligent
DC> DC> DC>design" has anything to do with science. 
DC> 
DC> DC> JB> You continue with your lies.  I've made no such statement
DC> DC>about ID.  I
DC> 
DC> DC>You have refused, yet again, to provide the scientific theory of
DC>ID.

DC> JB> It is irrelevant to the topic at hand and not something I chose
DC>to 

DC>Wrong again, Jeff.  

It is irrelevant to the topic at hand.  As I have stated numerous times, 
our government run schools teach many things which, including truckloads 
of leftwing dogma, are not science.  Again, I continue to see fear in 
your responses.  I don't see tolerance, understanding or a big tent. 


DC>We know you can't provide the scientific theory.  You realize that,
DC>too.   That's why you bob and weave like a bee on acid.  

I won't provide it.  Try and understand the difference between can't and 
won't.  Two letters may be too much for you.


Jeff

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999 
Socialism can work until you run out of everyone elses money .....



--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10