02 Aug 96 05:50, Daniel Morgan wrote to Paul Edwards:

 > To me, it just seems the current FSC and FTS documents are inadequate.

Which is one of the reasons NET_DEV exists - to fill the gaps.  Many of the
same questions raise their heads quite frequently, however, so perhaps some
sort of FTS FAQ would be useful.  No doubt such an "open"
document would go part-way to establishing better techincal standards
documents.

 > When it comes to various Fidonet message base formats, I think there 
 > should be a FSC/FTS document detailing each one.

Sure.  Now all we need somebody to write them.  |-)

Regards
Andrew

-- randy{at}zws.com

--- Msged/2 4.00