"Jeff Binkley -> Ross Sauer"  wrote in news:9740
$HOLYSMOKE{at}JamNNTPd:

 DC>>>> Wrong again, Jeff.  Whether ID is a science or not is core to
 DC>>>> the issue.

 JB>>> It is irrelevant to the topic at hand.  Our government run
 JB>>> schools teach many things other than science.

 RS>> Except we are disussing what is taught in SCIENCE CLASSROOMS, dolt.

 JB> "We" are not having that discussion.  You and Dan may be.
 I've made
no
 JB> statement about science classrooms.  I have been extremely clear that
I
 JB> am talking about in schools in general.

 JB> So you and Dan would be fine if ID were taught in our government run
 JB> schools, just not in a science classroom ?  I think not.  Do you also

That's right, Jeff, you don't think.
You just parrot right-wing talking points.

Ever hear of comparative studies of religion in social studies
classrooms?
Naturally, you'd be against that, because a properly-taught subject like
that would look at as many religions as possible, showing the strengths
and weaknesses of all.

 JB> specify what other school topics should be taught in what classrooms ?
 JB> You and Dan appear to be afraid of any topic which bring your dogma
into
 JB> question.

Precisely *WHAT* is my "dogma?"


 RS>> It's your ID fairy tale pushers that want to cram their religion
into
 RS>> science classrooms.

 JB> Your stereotypical bigotry is noted.

I'm not the one pushing for religious fairytales to be taught as
"science."

--- Xnews/5.04.25