*** Quoting Roy Witt from a message to Carol Shenkenberger ***

 RW>> That's not what I got out of what was reported here. A majority of
 RW>> tho who returned, errr replied to the question voted to move.

 CS> Naw, that was Vladimir's version of it.  His stance is that the ones
 CS> who didnt reply are inactive nodes.  Raises it to a whopping 33% I
 CS> think who want to move?

RW> Which is the proper way to look at it. Vladimir is correct in my
RW> estimation: if people aren't interested enough to respond to the inqui
RW> and make a stand one way or the other, those who did respond speak for
RW> entire zone. If you recall the elections in FN_SYSOP, some would have
RW> wait for every sysop in the nodelist to vote before there would have b
RW> a moderator there. That's ludicrous.

Maybe, but the upheaval of Fidonet as a whole wont happen over some 8% of
one region who voted to try it but never bothered to send the information
to the ZCC or even their own ZC.
                                       xxcarol

--- Telegard v3.09.g2-sp4