From: Chris Robinson 


--------------DF289EFD119A90C35E68C3B5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thanks :o) - nice to know.

Chris.

Rich wrote:

>    No truth. Rich
>
>      "Chris Robinson"  wrote in
>      message news:3EC1F90B.23C31FD0{at}NOSPAMtotalise.co.uk...I was
>      browsing a forum this morning as I often do and came across
>      the
>      post below:
>
>      http://snurl.com/1cqd
>      -------------------------------
>      "I am going to install and implement 2 Win2k Advanced
>      Servers for file
>      sharing, print server, and App Server. I went to a Win 2k
>      Server
>      training seminar and to make a long story short, was told
>      that XP Pro
>      will not work well with the Win 2k servers and that I should
>      upgrade all
>      my Win 95/98/ME's to Win 2k Pro and that I should downgrade
>      all of my XP
>      Pro's to Win 2k Pro. Is there any truth to this??"
>      -------------------------------
>
>      There aren't too many replies atm but the first reply to it
>      was quite
>      discouraging.  I'm ignoring the performance issues as this
>      can easily be
>      worked around with XP but the Win2k Server/ XP Client
>      compatibility is a
>      bit worring as I'm soon going to buy a new laptop for a
>      small firm I
>      look after - it was going to be XP Pro but the server is
>      Win2k Server.
>      Is there any truth in these problems that anyone knows?
>
>      Thanks,
>      Chris.
>

--------------DF289EFD119A90C35E68C3B5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit




Thanks :o) - nice to know.
Chris.
Rich wrote:

  
No truth. Rich 
"Chris
Robinson" <c.robinson{at}NOSPA">mailto:c.robinson{at}NOSPAMtotalise.co.uk">c.robinson{at}NOSPA
Mtotalise.co.uk>
wrote in message news:3EC
1F90B.23C31FD0{at}NOSPAMtotalise.co.uk...I
was browsing a forum this morning as I often do and came across the
post below:
http://snurl.com/1cqd;">http://snurl.com/1cqdhttp://snurl.com/1cqd">http://snurl.com/1cqd;
-------------------------------
"I am going to install and implement 2 Win2k Advanced Servers for file
sharing, print server, and App Server. I went to a Win 2k Server
training seminar and to make a long story short, was told that XP Pro
will not work well with the Win 2k servers and that I should upgrade
all
my Win 95/98/ME's to Win 2k Pro and that I should downgrade all of
my XP
Pro's to Win 2k Pro. Is there any truth to this??"
-------------------------------
There aren't too many replies atm but the first reply to it was quite
discouraging.  I'm ignoring the performance issues as this can
easily be
worked around with XP but the Win2k Server/ XP Client compatibility
is a
bit worring as I'm soon going to buy a new laptop for a small firm
I
look after - it was going to be XP Pro but the server is Win2k Server.
Is there any truth in these problems that anyone knows?
Thanks,
Chris.





--------------DF289EFD119A90C35E68C3B5--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4