-> On 30 Apr 09  17:33:15, Ed Hulett got back to Dan Ceppa 
-> Re: "Good Christians"

 EH>> other than white evangelicals, white non-Hispanic Catholics, white
 xx>> ^^^^^^^^^^
 EH>> mainline Protestants, and the religiously unaffiliated, because the
 EH>> sample size was too small."
 
 EH>> How convenient of you to leave off the last paragraph.
 
 DC> Do you any idea as to what you wrote and how wrong your analysis is?

 EH> The wording of the CNN blog posting made it sound like the sampling
 EH> was larger than it was. The sampling was so small it was pointless to
 EH> even take the poll. 

Demonstrate that the sample size was too small for the conclusions 
it drew.  

 DC> All it means is that there was enough data to show those relationships
 DC> with ALL of those groups MENTIONED.  Groups that WERE NOT mentioned
 DC> lacked a sufficient data to draw similar citings.

 EH> Actually it shows it was a very subjective sampling and the results
 EH> are skewed to fit you and Sauer's agenda. 

That's right, CNN is under Ross' control and fakes polls at his behest!  

 DC> A rough guess:  Groups with numbers under about 15% in the total
 DC> population were not individualy analyzed.  Your cult isn't large
 DC> enough to have been cited separately.

 EH> And here we have your bigotry on display yet again.

It's not my fault you joined a cult that wears magical underwear.  



... Still searching for a xian to call Mormons xian
--- OMX/Blue Wave/DOS v2.30