| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: dumb upgrade question |
From: Mike '/m'
If you check www.dell.com.nytimesoffer once or twice a week, you'll often
see a "free shipping" promotion. Now, if I could only get rid
of that
forced Windows XP purchase on the Dell desktop, I might even be tempted.
I picked up a nice media server from that page. 600SC box, Pentium 4
2.4GHz, 128MB memory, lots of drive bays, 40GB 7200GB drive, Intel gigabit
NIC. $312 including tax, no shipping charges.
The box was OS-free. It is now running RH Linux 8.0 with a 3Ware IDE RAID
controller; and 3 Maxtor 160GB 8MB cache 7200 rpm IDE drives, plus a 40GB
boot drive. It's also running Samba for Windows networking. :-)
/m
On Mon, 26 May 2003 09:49:45 -0400, "John Beamish"
wrote:
>I _almost_ agree with the Dell recommendation. Just remember that you will
have to pay shipping charges and at that price range they can represent a
non-trivial portion of the total cost.
>
>OTOH ... if you value your time at $50/hr the "cost" of
driving over, picking
up and bringing back the machine can easily match the Dell shipping costs.
> "Rich" wrote in message news:3ed1b231$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> I wouldn't recommend a best buy no-name box or the similar cheap ones at
compusa either. You can get an inexpensive Dell or HP box with Windows XP
preloaded for less than $400.
>
> I thought I saw one at compusa earlier today but can't find it on their
web site. Best Buy has a $499 HP system with a $100 gift card at
http://www.bestbuy.com/detail.asp?e=11216104&m=0&cat=0&scat=0.
There is a Presario desktop at
http://www.bestbuy.com/detail.asp?e=11214707&m=488&cat=490&
scat=491 which is also $499 and looks to have a $100 gift card and a $50
rebate. The HP system looks nicer as one might expect for $50 more.
>
> On its web site, Dell has a 2.2 GHz, 256 MB RAM, 30 GB disk, CD-R/W
system for $299. There is no free shipping this week so unless you can
convince them it may cost another $90 or so.
>
> Rich
>
> "Robert Comer" wrote in message
news:3ed19786{at}w3.nls.net...
> Cheapie consumers machines can do that nicely, so it'd probably pay you
> time-wise and frustration-wise to get an XPHome machine and be done with
it.
> I saw one in the Best Buy paper for less than $400, gotta add a monitor
> though. (or a Linux machine for even cheaper)
>
> - Bob Comer
>
>
> "Ellen K." wrote in message
> news:u343dv4kkk471lf1ls9r08qgb4tgji980b{at}4ax.com...
> > This isn't my development box, it's more like my email / internet /
> > cardfile box.
> >
> > On Wed, 14 May 2003 16:35:36 -0400, "Robert Comer"
> > wrote in message
:
> >
> > >Ellen, I agree with Rich (for once. ), a new
install is the best way
> to
> > >go over an upgrade.
> > >
> > >64MB would run W2K as Rich says, but it would be pretty slow doing
> > >development stuff. I'd get an upgrade if you can. (you
can never have
> > >enough RAM is what I go by and it's the absolute first
upgrade I think
> about
> > >if there's a performance problem...)
> > >
> > >- Bob Comer
> > >
> > >
> > >"Rich" wrote in message
news:3ec2a71a{at}w3.nls.net...
> > > The system requirements for Windows 2000 Professional
can be found
at
> >
>http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/professional/evaluation/sysreqs/.
> 64MB
> > >is the low end.
> > >
> > > Again, if you do this I would recommend against an upgrade. Do a
> clean
> > >install and reformat the hard disk.
> > >
> > >Rich
> > >
> > > "Robert Comer"
wrote in message
> > >news:3ec2a370$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > > > Would W2K even run on such a box? (I bought in in
early '98 I
> think.)
> > >
> > > Most likely, but there may be a driver problem if it's
not standard
> stuff
> > > from that time.
> > >
> > > >So far
> > > > I can't find memory for it, only have 64MB.
> > >
> > > What is it? (Make/model) I'll see if I can find out
more about it.
> > >
> > > > Also, with W2K wouldn't I want NTFS? Right now it's FAT32.
> > >
> > > If all you're going to do is run one OS on it, yep,
you'd want NTFS
--
> the
> > > W2K offers to upgrade your drive to NTFS, no problem. If you have
other
> > > partitions, there's a convert program you run after you do the
install.
> > >
> > > - Bob Comer
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Ellen K" wrote
in message
> > > news:909377.ae7c35{at}harborwebs.com...
> > > > Would W2K even run on such a box? (I bought in in
early '98 I
> think.)
> > >So
> > > far
> > > > I can't find memory for it, only have 64MB.
> > > >
> > > > Also, with W2K wouldn't I want NTFS? Right now it's FAT32.
> > > >
> > > > > From: "Robert Comer"
> > > > > Why not upgrade to W2KPro or WinXP -- it wouldn't be the
speediest
> box
> > > in
> > > > > the world, but it'd be more stable and run
more of today's
> programming
> > > > > stuff?
> > > > > - Bob Comer
> > > > > "Ellen K"
wrote in message
> > > > > news:509347.ac8012{at}harborwebs.com...
> > > > >> Urk. If that's the case then the only
thing I'd get with 98SE
> would
> > >be
> > > > > the
> > > > >> ability to run newer versions of stuff
that don't run on 95 any
> more
> > > (like
> > > > > the
> > > > >> Norton security stuff).
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Anything resembling power management is
already disabled.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> How do you shut down to the
"orange-on-black idiot screen only"?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> What about Rnaapp?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Maybe the original hard drive is starting
to go bad... ?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > From: "Frank Haber"
> > > > >> > Why do you think 98SE will help your
shutdown problem? Win 95
> did
> > >a
> > > > > pretty
> > > > >> > good job shutting down early APM
systems. 98SE had notorious
> > > problems
> > > > > with
> > > > >> > that, got two partially successful
patches for it, has had
whole
> > > > > websites
> > > > >> > written about its power problems.
There are still a bunch of
> > > machines
> > > > > out
> > > > >> > there that won't shut down properly.
> > > > >> > Have you considered just disabling
power management, shutting
> down
> > >to
> > > > > the
> > > > >> > orange-on-black idiot screen only,
then leaning on the power
> switch
> > > for
> > > > > five
> > > > >> > seconds?
> > >
> > >
> >
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/1.45)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.