20 Apr 06 17:05, Vladimir Donskoy wrote to Michiel van der Vlist:

 MV>> And what was|were the question(s) in the referendum?

 VD> Questions:
 VD> _A_
 VD> Are you agree with idea that it's time to increase the role of R2:50
 VD> in world Fidonet due to the fact that it forms the majority of the
 VD> world Fidonet?
 VD> Choices of answers:

 VD> _A1_
 VD>  I am agree we have to form Z7 for migration of all R50's sysops into
 VD> it. Comment: with keeping numbers of networks.
 VD> _A2_
 VD>  I am agree that Z7 should be formed of volunteers first for purpose
 VD> of clearing technical and political questions of the migration. Total
 VD> migration (as in variant "A1") is expected in some time later.
 VD> Comment: with new address maps.
 VD> _A3_
 VD> I am agree with both of "A1" and "A2".
 VD> _A4_
 VD> I am not agree with all above.
 VD> _B_
 VD> I am satisfied with current role of R2:50 in world Fidonet.

 VD> The results of referenda:
 VD> Total amount of votes -- 561.
 VD>  Choice €1 -- 140
 VD>  Choice €2 --  68
 VD>  Choice €3 -- 146
 VD>  Choice €4 --  34
 VD>  Choice B  -- 173

Was this referendum sent to 'all' nodes in R50? In your estimation, how
many 'active' nodes are there in R50?


Roy
--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000