> Is anyone using NASM 0.95? How does it compare to other Assemblers
> that you have tried.
I'm (trying) to use NASM 0.94 under Linux now and then. What I'm 
lacking is a good debugger, actually lacking a method to generate 
a symbol table that the debuggers will accept..
DOS's NASM is good, and you can get it to work somewhat well with
ZD86-101, sans symbols (the best part of a debugger). ZD86 works 
fairly well (most of the time) with Arrow assembler.
zd86-101.arj  - f'req from 1:346/15  
--- ifmail-tx (i386 Linux)
---------------