From: Bryan Pope 

And thusly Rick Ethridge spake:
> 
> The term "classic" has been bantered around quite a bit
here. I would presume the term to mean computers that have special merit
and have stood the test of time. I would preclude ANY IBM fully compatible
computer as so many exist in all forms. 
> What would I consider as being a "classic"? Obviously, the
very first kit
> systems such as the IMSAI are classics and, in fact, are still being
> manufactured! The original TRS-80 computer has to be a classic as is the Apple
> ][. The original Atari 400/800 systems are classics. The Commodore 64 is
> definitely a classic with near-cult status. The Amiga A1000 is a classic but the
> A500 or later shouldn't be considered as such. The same goes for the original
> Mac or Lisa computers. Don't forget the mention of famous minicomputers such as
> the PDP series or VAX! This is only a partial listing with many more machines
> worth mentioning. Obviouly, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. RLE 

A classic could also be the first computer you used, or a computer
"upgrade"
you bought.

For instance the first computer I used and started to learn about computers 
was a Commodore PET at a friends place and then at public school...  Then 
my parents bought a Commodore 64 :) and later on I bought an Amiga 500.

But then after that things like an IBM PC just were not as fun or 
enjoyable to use anymore...  

Cheers,

Bryan Pope

--- ifmail v.2.15