Hello Leonard!

May 08 01:35 03, Leonard Erickson wrote to Bo Simonsen:

 LE>> Nope. The B channels are 64k *if you are running data over them*.

 BS>> Ok, V110L and V120L is running 64k too?

 LE> From the nodelist comments:

 LE> V110L     ITU-T V.110 19k2 aasync ('low').
 LE> V110H     ITU-T V.110 38k4 async ('high').
 LE> V120L     ITU-T V.120 56k async, layer 2 framesize 259, window 7,
 LE>           modulo 8.
 LE> V120H     ITU-T V.120 64k async, layer 2 framesize 259, window 7,
 LE>           modulo 8.

Ok.. Is it possible to use V120H in the US? ... I allways use X.75, my
mailer disconnect after connect, then i use V120.

 BS>> I'm charged for less if it made a Data isdn call. The transmission 
 BS>> tax is actually 2 cents lower. 

 LE> Well, nobody ever claimed the US phone companies were all that bright
 LE> about pricing things. The places were ISDN was flat rate it catch on
 LE> like made. In the places with excessive charges, it didn't catch on. 

Allright.. If ISDN was flatrate, i don't belive i had adsl.. I like ISDN more..

 LE> And in both cases it was the result of self-fulfilling phrophecies. 
 LE> The
 LE> high rate places charged high rates because they figure that very few
 LE> people would buy it, so they need high prices to recover their
 LE> investment in the gear neeeded for *anyone* to have it. 

Oh ok

 LE> In the lowe rate places, they expected a *lot* of users. so they set
 LE> the rates low...

Ofcause.

Regards,
Bo

--- Msged/LNX 6.1.2