Ross Sauer -> Ed Hulett wrote:
 RS> "Ed Hulett -> JOHNJWILSON"  wrote in
 RS> news:10516$HOLYSMOKE{at}JamNNTPd:

 J>>> What is puzzling to me is that those who protest loudly against
 EH>>   abortions J> because it is interfering with God (Or The Natural
 EH>>   Order of things)... J> generally make exception in the case of rape
 EH>>   or incest...God, it seems J> would agree with THOSE abortions...(Or
 EH>>   bodies who naturally abort...)

 EH>> That is another ignorant position. The only event abortion is even
 EH>> remotely acceptable is when the life of the mother is in danger. That
 EH>> is in less that one tenth of a percent of all abortions.

 RS> So if "Good ol' Uncle Charlie" molests his 13-year old
niece, the 13-year
 RS> girl *HAS* to have the baby.

That scenario is even less than when the mother is in danger.

 RS> Or have you forgotten about cases of rape and incest?

Not at all. Most rapes do *NOT* result in pregnancy. Rape and incest is
about power and not sex. In many cases the perpetrator is impotent.

Ed

-- 
"The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is
to fill the world with fools." --Herbert Spencer

"The principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under
the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale."
 --Thomas Jefferson

Linux User# 416016
Linux Machine# 379711

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105)