EH> >>>> Then she may not like having a new law passed that will fine
EH> >>>> her for not being
EH> >>>> insured.

EH> ST>>> It wouldn't happen because they would provide her insurance
EH> ST>>> she could afford.  She would be fined if she didn't get any
EH> EH>> insurance, but not if she
EH> ST>>> couldn't afford it.  That's one of the misconceptions that is
EH> ST>>> consistently being popularized by the conservative movement
EH> ST>>> that is trying to get this discredited.  I thought you'd be
EH> ST>>> better than that.

EH> EH>> So, only those who can afford health insurance but refuse to
EH> EH>> buy it will be fined? Where is the authority to do that in the
EH> EH>> Constitution? And who exactly do you think will pay for those
EH> EH>> who cannot afford to pay for their own? The "evil" rich?

EH> JB> Have you seen now where the unions are lining up against this ?
EH> JB> They have figured out that these "caddilac" healthcare plans
EH> JB> that are going to be taxed include their own.  Nobody is going
EH> JB> to take away what they have fought and struck over for years.
EH> JB> It is funny to watch.

EH>I noticed that. It's interesting to see them do a 180 so quickly
EH>without getting whiplash.

Any time the government says they are here to help you, grab your 
wallet.


Jeff

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999 
Democrats --  The party of economic slavery ....

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10