EH> >> Then she may not like having a new law passed that will fine her
EH> >> for not being
EH> >> insured.

EH> ST> It wouldn't happen because they would provide her insurance she
EH> ST> could afford.  She would be fined if she didn't get any
EH>insurance, but not if she
EH> ST> couldn't afford it.  That's one of the misconceptions that is
EH> ST> consistently being popularized by the conservative movement that
EH> ST> is trying to get this discredited.  I thought you'd be better
EH> ST> than that.

EH>So, only those who can afford health insurance but refuse to buy it
EH>will be fined? Where is the authority to do that in the Constitution?
EH>And who exactly do you think will pay for those who cannot afford to
EH>pay for their own? The "evil" rich?

Have you seen now where the unions are lining up against this ?  They 
have figured out that these "caddilac" healthcare plans that are going 
to be taxed include their own.  Nobody is going to take away what they 
have fought and struck over for years.  It is funny to watch. 


Jeff

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999 
Hope and change = $1T deficit and 10%+ unemployment .....

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10