21 Apr 06 10:54, Vladimir Donskoy wrote to Roy Witt:

 VD> Hi Roy!

 VD> Thursday April 20 2006, Roy Witt wrote to Vladimir Donskoy:

 RW>> You've probably read some discussion here about the Z6C killing off
 RW>> Zone 6 by this coming June. Why not take back to your collegues the
 RW>> idea of moving your Fidonet Region to Z6. There you can appoint your
 RW>> own ZC who can work with your collegues to form your own ZMH. That
 RW>> would solve two of your problems without having to work within Z2's.
 RW>> This would also be easier than creating another zone within Fidonet.

 VD> To me it will be personally indifferent which number at our zone

It may be, but creating zone 7 in Fidonet means that number would have to
be shared with another network.

 VD> if only we could pass in it the laws solving our problems.

That would be nice...

 VD> As you could notice, in a referendum number of our zone has not been
 VD> specified so its result can be treated and for Z6.

Yes, that's true. But your referandum had too many choices. And they
should have required only 'Yes' or 'No' answers.


Roy
--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000