From: "Rich"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0279_01C31A1D.1F885CF0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The system requirements for Windows 2000 Professional can be found at =
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/professional/evaluation/sysreqs/. =
64MB is the low end.
Again, if you do this I would recommend against an upgrade. Do a =
clean install and reformat the hard disk.
Rich
"Robert Comer" wrote in message =
news:3ec2a370$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Would W2K even run on such a box? (I bought in in early '98 I =
think.)
Most likely, but there may be a driver problem if it's not standard =
stuff
from that time.
>So far
> I can't find memory for it, only have 64MB.
What is it? (Make/model) I'll see if I can find out more about it.
> Also, with W2K wouldn't I want NTFS? Right now it's FAT32.
If all you're going to do is run one OS on it, yep, you'd want NTFS -- =
the
W2K offers to upgrade your drive to NTFS, no problem. If you have =
other
partitions, there's a convert program you run after you do the =
install.
- Bob Comer
"Ellen K" wrote in message
news:909377.ae7c35{at}harborwebs.com...
> Would W2K even run on such a box? (I bought in in early '98 I =
think.) So
far
> I can't find memory for it, only have 64MB.
>
> Also, with W2K wouldn't I want NTFS? Right now it's FAT32.
>
> > From: "Robert Comer"
> > Why not upgrade to W2KPro or WinXP -- it wouldn't be the speediest =
box
in
> > the world, but it'd be more stable and run more of today's =
programming
> > stuff?
> > - Bob Comer
> > "Ellen K" wrote in message
> > news:509347.ac8012{at}harborwebs.com...
> >> Urk. If that's the case then the only thing I'd get with 98SE =
would be
> > the
> >> ability to run newer versions of stuff that don't run on 95 any =
more
(like
> > the
> >> Norton security stuff).
> >>
> >> Anything resembling power management is already disabled.
> >>
> >> How do you shut down to the "orange-on-black idiot
screen only"?
> >>
> >> What about Rnaapp?
> >>
> >> Maybe the original hard drive is starting to go bad... ?
> >>
> >> > From: "Frank Haber"
> >> > Why do you think 98SE will help your shutdown problem? Win 95 =
did a
> > pretty
> >> > good job shutting down early APM systems. 98SE had notorious
problems
> > with
> >> > that, got two partially successful patches for it, has had =
whole
> > websites
> >> > written about its power problems. There are still a bunch of
machines
> > out
> >> > there that won't shut down properly.
> >> > Have you considered just disabling power management, shutting =
down to
> > the
> >> > orange-on-black idiot screen only, then leaning on the power =
switch
for
> > five
> >> > seconds?
------=_NextPart_000_0279_01C31A1D.1F885CF0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The
system requirements =
for Windows=20
2000 Professional can be found at http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/professional/evaluation/sysr=
eqs/">http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/professional/evaluation/sysreq=
s/. =20
64MB is the low end.
Again, if
you do this I =
would=20
recommend against an upgrade. Do a clean install and reformat the = hard=20
disk.
Rich
"Robert Comer" <bobcomer{at}mindspring.com>">mailto:bobcomer{at}mindspring.com">bobcomer{at}mindspring.com>
= wrote in=20
message news:3ec2a370$1{at}w3.nls.net...>=20
Would W2K even run on such a box? (I bought in in early '98 I=20
think.)Most likely, but there may be a driver problem if it's =
not=20
standard stufffrom that time.>So
far> I can't =
find=20
memory for it, only have 64MB.What is it? =
(Make/model) =20
I'll see if I can find out more about it.>
Also, with W2K =
wouldn't=20
I want NTFS? Right now it's
FAT32.If all you're =
going to=20
do is run one OS on it, yep, you'd want NTFS -- theW2K offers to =
upgrade=20
your drive to NTFS, no problem. If you have otherpartitions, =
there's a=20
convert program you run after you do the install.- Bob=20
Comer"Ellen
K" <Ellen.K{at}harborwebs.com>">mailto:Ellen.K{at}harborwebs.com">Ellen.K{at}harborwebs.com>
=
wrote in=20
messagenews:909377.ae7c35{at}harborwebs.=
com...>=20
Would W2K even run on such a box? (I bought in in early '98 I=20
think.) Sofar> I can't find memory
for it, only have=20
64MB.>> Also, with W2K wouldn't I want
NTFS? =
Right=20
now it's FAT32.>> > From:
"Robert Comer" <bobcomer{at}mindspring.com>mailto:bobcomer{at}mindspring.com">bobcomer{at}mindspring.com>
R>>=20
> Why not upgrade to W2KPro or WinXP -- it wouldn't be the =
speediest=20
boxin> > the world, but it'd be more
stable and run more =
of=20
today's programming> > stuff?>
> - Bob =
Comer> >=20
"Ellen K" <Ellen.K{at}harborwebs.com>">mailto:Ellen.K{at}harborwebs.com">Ellen.K{at}harborwebs.com>
=
wrote in=20
message> > news:509347.ac8012{at}harborwebs.=
com...>=20
>> Urk. If that's the case then the only thing I'd get =
with 98SE=20
would be> > the>
>> ability to run newer =
versions of=20
stuff that don't run on 95 any more(like>
> the> =
>>=20
Norton security stuff).>
>>> >> Anything =
resembling=20
power management is already disabled.>
>>> =
>> How do=20
you shut down to the "orange-on-black idiot screen
only"?>=20
>>> >> What about
Rnaapp?> >>> =
>>=20
Maybe the original hard drive is starting to go bad... ?>=20
>>> >> > From:
"Frank Haber" <frhaber{at}N0SPMrcn.com>>=">mailto:frhaber{at}N0SPMrcn.com">frhaber{at}N0SPMrcn.com>>=
=20
>> > Why do you think 98SE will help your shutdown =
problem? Win=20
95 did a> > pretty>
>> > good job shutting =
down=20
early APM systems. 98SE had
notoriousproblems> >=20
with> >> > that, got two partially
successful patches =
for it,=20
has had whole> > websites>
>> > written =
about its=20
power problems. There are still a bunch
ofmachines> =
>=20
out> >> > there that won't shut
down properly.> =
>> > Have you considered just disabling power management, =
shutting=20
down to> > the> >>
> orange-on-black idiot =
screen=20
only, then leaning on the power switchfor> > =
five>=20
>> >
seconds?
------=_NextPart_000_0279_01C31A1D.1F885CF0--
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/1.45)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270
@PATH: 379/1 633/267
|