Hello Tim,

> That number of yours has a lot of holes in it. Where did that number come

Read my reply to Earl.

> But they fail to mention *how large a part*.....nor do they explain how 
> they
> come by their numbers.

The reporter didn't give a detailed account of the facts, but since it's a 
Harvard study, they will have that information publically available.  Since 
you are so curious, why do you ask them?  Having knowledge about how these 
types of studies and formulas are done, I'm comfortable with their results.

> Um.....`excuse me'? *The republicans* forcing an empty solution down our
> throats?

Yes, they don't have a solution - and that's the point.  Remember when our 
president and that ass shouted " You Lie " ?  During that same moment, the 
republicans were waiving around pieces of paper.  Do you know what was 
written on them?  Nothing.  They were blank, empty, void of words (that's 
all information that is publically available).  The republicans want the 
same-old - same-old, no solutions for the masses without the means in which 
to afford it or the problems with being rejected.

> The last time I looked......Obama was a democrat. So is Chris Dodd, so is
> Pelosi, so is Reid! And this whole issue is being pushed by *the 
> democrats*!

The public option, yes.  You were confused as to what I was referring in 
this post.

Shannon 

--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a