| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: STAR TREK THE WRATH OF KHAN: was What Did |
From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From Address: David{at}block.net
Subject: Re: STAR TREK THE WRATH OF KHAN: was What Did You Watch?
2013-06-01(Saturday)
On 6/16/2013 6:24 PM, ~consul wrote:
> 'tis on this 6/6/2013 12:40 PM, wrote David Johnston thus to say:
>> On 6/5/2013 11:35 PM, Wiseguy wrote:
>>> David Johnston wrote in
>>>> On 6/5/2013 12:41 AM, Halmyre wrote:
>>>>> On Jun 4, 5:06 pm, anim8rFSK wrote:
>>>>>> The history of the universe and basic physics were already
>>>>>> completely different in the first movie when Nero
first appeared.
>>>>> But the laws of physics are...erm, unchangeable...
>>>> I dunno about that. The way warp drive works changed
between TOS and
>>>> TNG. And that wasn't even supposed to be a parallel universe.
>>> They took place several decades apart. Can't there be any advancements
>>> in what is a FICTIONAL universe?
>> I don't consider changing how speed is measured to a asymptotic scale
>> to be an advancement.
>
> I was wondering what was meant up there, but if that was it, isn't like
> changing the temperature scales? First it was -32F, then it was 0C, now
> it's 273K.
It's more like changing from miles per hour to knots. It isn't just the
size of warp factors that changed, it's what they are measuring.
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux
* Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (1:2320/105.97)* Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1) SEEN-BY: 3/0 633/267 712/0 101 620 848 @PATH: 2320/105 0/0 261/38 712/848 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.