~>  where I prove he is the one

You got yourself banned from here, because you "rejected" the rules and
then could not do the ethical action to avoid the echo.  Instead you
stayed, you repeatedly broke the rules, you ignored repeated warnings, and
then you posted further in spite of being suspended and then banned.

You have proven two things.  First, you have proven (once again) your
willingness to spit in the face of your sysop.  You migrated here after
having friction with Ed over these matters.  Shannon gives you free access
to his BBS, and you repeatedly break his rules as well as the echo rules. 
This example is especially obvious, since you went back EIGHT DAYS to pick
up an old post TO ME in a thread where you already had responded elsewhere
to MORE RECENT posts in the thread.

Second, you have proven (once again) your willingness to break rules. 
Funny thing about that: Shannon was one of the sysops YOU were whining to
about ME.  When you did your little revenge-banning of me from your echo
(in spite of the fact that I broke no rule) I ceased posting in your echo.
 If I were to do what you have repeatedly done, you would be whining in a
high-pitched screech that would catch the attention of dogs in three states.

And, of course, if others were to ignore the rules in YOUR pigpen of an
echo and continue to post there, you would look like a glaring hypocrite if
you went whining to their sysops about THEM.  You wouldn't notice that, of
course, since you already realize that you ARE a hypocrite.  That is why
you refused to follow the no-hypocrisy rule.

You created an echo for the purpose of responding THERE to posts in THIS
echo.  Take your droppings there the next time you are posting on fidonet
at 3:58 in the morning.  If your personality disorder makes it impossible
to control your behavior, perhaps you should request that Shannon cut off
your write-access to this echo.

 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a