Ross Sauer -> Jeff Binkley wrote:
 RS> "Jeff Binkley -> Ross Sauer"  wrote
in news:10493
 RS> $HOLYSMOKE{at}JamNNTPd:

 RS>>> It *IS* politics.
 RS>>> Whether you like it or not.

 JB>> No, it is life and death, whether you like it or not.

 RS> How many unwanted babies have *YOU* adopted?

If the baby isn't wanted, why make one?

 RS> None? Figures.

Why should he?

 RS> Just not convenient, I guess.

He's not the one who made the baby, so why blame him? He didn't force the
woman to become pregnant. You should focus your righteous indignation at
the woman having unprotected sex and then aborting the baby because it is
inconvenient.

 RS>>> If it really was for the "life of the baby,"
these noisy anti-
 RS> choice
 RS>>> activists would be putting more efforts into advocating for
 RS> prenatal
 RS>>> and postnatal care, and better education to prevent pregnancies in
 RS>>> the first place.

 JB>> Not when they are dead.  You can't care for an aborted fetus.

 RS> So when do you start caring for an unaborted fetus?

When it is his to care for. Why should others pay for the inconveniences of
those who choose to have unprotected sex? If the woman doesn't want the
child, she should be more careful.

 RS>>> Instead we get this "abtinence only" fantasy
which while in theory
 RS>>> would work, in practice it doesn't.
 RS>>> Just ask Bristol Palin.

 RS>>> You remember what abortion was like, *PRIOR* to Roe V. Wade?
 RS>>> A hodgepodge of laws from state to state, with rich women paying
 RS>>> under the table or going on "European Vacations."
 RS>>> And poor women died.

 RS>>> There is one key word in this whole thing.
 RS>>> Control.

 RS>>> And the anti-choice activists want it.

 JB>> That makes no sense.  What they want is life.  You distort the issue
 RS> so
 JB>> that you can sleep well at night.  In none of your response did you
 RS> show
 JB>> any concern for the unborn.  None at all.  That is telling.

 RS> What's even more telling is how you claim to be
"pro-life" but have done
 RS> diddly squat, I guess you don't want a rugrat spitting up in your
 RS> Porsche or Hummer.

Good grief. Why should Jeff care for someone else's "mistake?"

Your silly notion that Jeff is somehow responsible for some woman aborting
her child is bizarre.

Ed

-- 
"The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is
to fill the world with fools." --Herbert Spencer

"The principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under
the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale."
 --Thomas Jefferson

Linux User# 416016
Linux Machine# 379711

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105)