RM> When my Sweatsock gives this response, it normally means that the
RM> line was too foul for the modems to negotiate an MNP/v42 (whatever)
RM> error correction. After this, the modem ivariably starts receiving
RM> almost pure junk. I get several connections like this per year, and
RM> some time ago told the modem to &M5 to save me the trouble of
RM> hanging up.

Can you give me some idea of the % of MONITORED calls that you have
had in the past 6 months that connected successfully?  BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---