| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: none |
Hi Michiel! Wednesday April 19 2006, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Roy Witt: MvdV>>> Why all this silly talk about "having a zone of their own"? It MvdV>>> is just a number man! RW>> No, it's also self rule, for them. MV> They'd still be subject to policy no matter what number stands before the MV> colon. MV> yesm they coukd write a zone policy. as they can write a region policy MV> now. Germany did that. No, "Local Policy" may not contradict Policy, so ZMH problem may be decide only for Zone Policy (ZMH establish by ZC). And new control/management level between RC and NCs may not include by Local Policy... Other problems of our region may decide only on Zone level too. MvdV>>> Yes, Z2 would no longer be the largest zone. Ward would not be MvdV>>> the ZC of the largest zone any more. That would be Z6 and MvdV>>> someone not called Ward Dossche but having another name would MvdV>>> be the ZC of the largest zone. RW>> Probably a Russian. MV> Probably. And what would *really* change? Other than the nationality of MV> the ZC of the biggest zone? At first Ward must want self-election. And on current time we have only 1 vote on Z2C election - so, Russian ZC can't victory... But I think that if R50 stay in Z2 - ZMH problem can't decide: time which better for us is not arrange to west Z2 sysops (other regions). Of cource, may exist Zone Policy specially for us... At any case this variant better then current state. Regards, Vladimir Donskoy --- GoldED+/W32-MINGW 1.1.5-b20060218* Origin: DVB Station (2:5020/2992) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 5020/2992 715 292/854 140/1 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.