A little more background to the thread.  One of the things done to Kathleen
Willey was vandalism to her car tires.  When Buchanan got to Shearer's
house, he broke into the garage and damaged Shearer's tires.  Then, instead
of continuing on into the house looking for Shearer, he went outside.  Some
house guests heard the air seeping out of the tires, went to investigate,
and confronted Buchanan outside.  He waved a gun at them, told them to get
away from him, and continued on to his car and drove off.  Out of nowhere,
Klahn says "Buchanan was not hunting Shearer's tires."  In reality the tire
thing is the only important point on which there is actual, PHYSICAL
evidence and absolutely NO controversy (outside of Klahn's head).

~>  EC> To recap, Klahn says the guy did NOT go after the tires,
~>  EC> which is so profoundly false as to be delusional.  He broke
~>  EC> into the garage, vandalized the tires just as Kathleen
~>  EC> Willey's tires had been vandalized, and then instead of
~>  EC> continuing on into the house he went back outside.

~>  Again Croasmun suggests Buchanan went stalking Shearer's tires.

Once again he surrenders on every factual issue.  He realizes he is wrong,
he ignores all the facts, and he tries to make his response about me rather
than about the facts.  And in the process he makes up something and then
falsely attributes it to me.  You won't admit it, perhaps, but you realize
that he makes up such things all the time.  In this case he characterizes
the action as "stalking," which simply shows that he does not understand
the concept.  Lets say that you hear about someone killing a dog.  You look
up their address, you go to their house, and you kill their dog.  That
would be a crime, but not stalking (ie, unwanted attention or following).

You have seen his tactics many times.  This is just an opportunity for you
to see them out in the open, not surrounded by his volumes of clutter.
 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a