On 05-20-09, ROSS SAUER said to JEFF BINKLEY:


RS>> "Pro-abortion" does *NOT* exist.


JB> I notice you have gone mute with me on this topic.


RS>Because you have no clue as to what being pro-choice *REALLY* is, not your
RS>right-wing "Christian" fantasies.


I am sure, in your vastly superior wisdom, `you' could explain it to the rest
of us.


What `pro-choice' *REALLY* means is that somewhere in America, some female has
*CHOSEN* to end the life of a human.


She was too tight-fisted to spend the few bucks it takes to purchase and use
one of the various effective birth control pills, and too stupid to do sex in
a way that didn't end in a pregnancy, but she doesn't mind putting out the two
or three hundred dollars it costs for an abortion.


Given her level of reasoning on the cost difference between a few pills, or a
medical procedure, what qualifies her to decide the life or death of a human
fetus? For that matter....what qualifies her to make the decision to engage in
sex to begin with?


---
*Durango b301 #PE*