"Jeff Binkley -> Ross Sauer"  wrote in news:10493
$HOLYSMOKE{at}JamNNTPd:

 RS>> It *IS* politics.
 RS>> Whether you like it or not.

 JB> No, it is life and death, whether you like it or not.

How many unwanted babies have *YOU* adopted?
None? Figures.
Just not convenient, I guess.

 RS>> If it really was for the "life of the baby," these noisy anti-
choice
 RS>> activists would be putting more efforts into advocating for
prenatal
 RS>> and postnatal care, and better education to prevent pregnancies in
 RS>> the first place.

 JB> Not when they are dead.  You can't care for an aborted fetus.

So when do you start caring for an unaborted fetus?

 RS>> Instead we get this "abtinence only" fantasy which
while in theory
 RS>> would work, in practice it doesn't.
 RS>> Just ask Bristol Palin.

 RS>> You remember what abortion was like, *PRIOR* to Roe V. Wade?
 RS>> A hodgepodge of laws from state to state, with rich women paying
 RS>> under the table or going on "European Vacations."
 RS>> And poor women died.

 RS>> There is one key word in this whole thing.
 RS>> Control.

 RS>> And the anti-choice activists want it.

 JB> That makes no sense.  What they want is life.  You distort the issue
so
 JB> that you can sleep well at night.  In none of your response did you
show
 JB> any concern for the unborn.  None at all.  That is telling.

What's even more telling is how you claim to be "pro-life" but have done
diddly squat, I guess you don't want a rugrat spitting up in your
Porsche or Hummer.

--- Xnews/5.04.25