From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From Address: wheresourblessing{at}israels.wars
Subject: Re: Star Trek Into Darkness

On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 15:55:52 -0700 (PDT), Will Dockery
 wrote:

>Just saw Star Trek Into Darkness and mulling it... have some clues to
where it may  go next... or some possible ideas.
>
>Will ST #3 be "The Menagerie" perhaps?


You misspelled, "retarded".

And yes, it will be.

-.-

The truth about the Anne Frank Diary was first revealed in 1959 by the
Swedish journal Fria Ord. It established that the Jewish novelist
Meyer Levin had written the dialogue of the "diary" and was demanding
payment for his work in a court action against Otto Frank.

A condensation of the Swedish articles appeared in the American
Economic Council Letter, April 15th, 1959, as follows: "History has
many examples of myths that live a longer and richer life than truth,
and may become more effective than truth. The Western World has for
some years been made aware of a Jewish girl through the medium of what
purports to be her personally written story, Anne Frank's Diary. Any
informed literary inspection of this book would have shown it to have
been impossible as the work of a teenager."

A noteworthy decision of the New York Supreme Court confirms this
point of view, in that the well known American Jewish writer, Meyer
Levin, has been awarded $50,000 to be paid him by the father of Anne
Frank as an honorarium for Levin's work on The Anne Frank Diary. "Mr.
Frank, in Switzerland, has promised to pay to his race kin, Meyer
Levin, not less than $50,000 because he had used the dialogue of
Author Levin just as it was and 'implanted' it in the diary as being
his daughter's intellectual work."

Further inquiries brought a reply on May 7th, 1962 from a firm of New
York lawyers, which stated: "I was the attorney for Meyer Levin in his
action against Otto Frank, and others. It is true that a jury awarded
Mr. Levin $50,000 in damages, as indicated in your letter. That award
was later set aside by the trial justice, Hon. Samuel C. Coleman, on
the ground that the damages had not been proved in the manner required
by law. The action was subsequently settled while an appeal from Judge
Coleman's decision was pending. I am afraid that the case itself is
not officially reported, so far as the trial itself, or even Judge
Coleman's decision, is concerned. Certain procedural matters were
reported in 141 New York Supplement, Second Series 170, and in 5
Second Series 181. The correct file number in the New York County
Clerk's office is 2241rCo1956 and the file is probably a large and
full one..."

Here, then, is just one more fraud in a whole series of frauds
perpetrated in support of the "Holocaust" legend and the saga of the
"Six Million".

From: "Did Six Million Really Die?" by Richard Harwood
       Pg. 21 - "BEST-SELLER A HOAX"

--- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux