~>  EC> In reality he could not APPEAR to have possession of a
~>  EC> knife "when he was caught" because he was not
"caught" at
~>  EC> all.
 
~>  BFD. The best you can do is one error

Klahn is doing his usual "bore people to death with volume and repetition" 
routine.  He is trying to cover up his abject surrender with lots of smoke.  
Anyone who remembers the origin of the thread will recall that I pointed to 
Bob making one glaring error and three claims that were variations from the 
facts.

He has now conceded all four of those points!!!  In doing so he tossed in 
tangential lies, fictionalizations, word-games, and various forms of bluster.  
But he has conceded the validity of all four points I originally made.

~>  Apparently had does not mean he was seen with it,
~>  but that it is a reasonable conclusion.

Not just word-games, but inept word-games accompanied by faulty logic.

~>  EC> Kathleen Willey's
~>  EC> tires were slashed by means of having a series of nails
~>  EC> sunk into them, as if by a construction nail gun.  The only

~>  And that is *NOT* slashing by any definition I know.

Really silly word-games.

~>  OTOH, now Croasmun is suggesting Buchanan stalked Shearer armed
~>  with a nail gun?

A lying declarative sentence with a bogus question mark added by Klahn at 
the end.  We have seen that many times.

~>  EC> But Bob says Buchanan used a knife.  And Bob says that
~>  EC> Buchanan appeared to be carrying that knife when the police
~>  EC> caught him in time to save Shearer's life.  Bob says a lot
~>  EC> of things.  And then he runs away from what he says.
 
~>  Earl keeps distorting what I said.

I directly quoted his words many times over.  That is something he is 
incapable of doing when he makes his accusations.

 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a